Assertions which set at the 'Execute Subprocess Step(s)'

Idea created by support-lisa-jiec on Jul 12, 2016
    New
    Score8
    • TakumiYasuhiro
    • tommy_jp
    • JIEC
    • vishnu38
    • gen01
    • Ryu_JP
    • support-lisa-jiec
    • naval.dogra

    If the subprocess is failed, the whole test is stopped and never invoke the assertions/filters at the Execute Subprocess step in the main test case.

     

    I want to decide whether the sub-process fails by using the assertion which set at the 'Execute Subprocess Step(s)' in the main test case.

     

    For example, what about to change as follows?
    ・If the sub-process fails, a transition to a new step of the "sub-process failure step" instead of the usual "failure step".
    ・It returns a status of "sub-process failed to run" to the main test case.