Clarity

Hi all,

we have tried xogging out a look up,the output file had multiple language description.

Please let us know how to xog out look up for particular Language.

Thanks in Advance !

Regards,

Noorjahan

Hello Noorjahan,

Thhis is already discussed before in communities.

Can you please check this thread?

languageCode suppress on XOG object read?

Regards

Chandrani

Sr. Support Engineer

Hi Noorjahan,

In the mean time, you can vote up this idea - Optional Language Packs

Regards,

Georgy

Just wondering again...

Has anybody tried if the suggestion by my skilled colleaque PP

        <args name="no_dependencies" value="true" />

         <args name="nls_language" value="en" />

works with lookups.

urmas wrote:

 

Just wondering again...

Has anybody tried if the suggestion by my skilled colleaque PP

        <args name="no_dependencies" value="true" />

         <args name="nls_language" value="en" />

works with lookups.

Have you?

Not yet, I'm told that it works in some cases, but not all. That is all things you can XOG out.

Hi Urmas,

Wow!!! We tried the nls_language tag for a XOG read of a clarity process...It works, as now its not giving 20 similar lines just for the start step or for the process name and we just get one line as below : <nls languageCode="en" name="Start"/>

But we also had in the XOG output of the process a static lookup CAL_EVENT_PRIORITY with all the language descriptions for the lookup values.

Regards,

Georgy

.. it works in some cases, but not all....

So it would be nice to know that list of what works and what doesn't (and at what Clarity versions) wouldn't it!  ( @anyone_from_CA )

Peep says it does not work with lookups on anything where the output cointains lookups.

Then on the other hand if the output does not contain language it does not do anything either.

^ which rather contradicts Georgy 's initial findings ; that the arg worked on the process part of the XML but not on the lookup part.

How do you mean? To me they sound like the same conclusion.

I was probably just mis-interpreting what you were saying - "on" vs "or"

As said it does not work everywhere and I have not used that after I heard about it.
Anybody with more experience please post here.