For Lisa-Invoke, is there an advantage between executing a .tst directly or building/deploying and then executing a .mar file?
I seem to recall that .mar being self-contained made the test execution faster, but I've searched and can't find confirmation - can anyone confirm/expand on this topic?
thanks,
-Jason
Hi Jason
It all depends on what you need to do. Some customers go the mar route since they need a way for a test to be portable across devtest environments. If you are just doing a basic test on a single system under test, you may not want to go the mar route. If you have multiple environments with different versions of the app you want to test, and those test you are running are tailored to the version of the build you are running, you may want to go the mar route. Its all up to the requirements you need to meet
Hope this helps.
Joe