Symantec Access Management

  • Private Community

  • 1.  Decrypted value of smCommandData4 in AgentCommand (AgentKey)

    Posted Feb 08, 2018 10:20 AM

    Reference Thread / Comment : https://communities.ca.com/message/242041650-re-ca-sso-how-policy-servers-will-be-synchronized?commentID=242041650&et=wa… 

    Opening onbehalf of Dhilip : Dhi1ip

     

    Question
    I understand that smKeyMarker4 in AgentKey Object will be used to differentiate the keys. As you have confirmed, smCommandData4 in AgentCommand will contain AgentKeys (presuming it will have all 4 agent keys). My doubt is, how are we differentiating the 4 keys which are in a single attribute i.e., smCommandData4 of AgentKey? Will it have parameter name as well (or) are we using any delimiter? In case, if we decrypt the value of smCommandData4, how will it look like?


  • 2.  Re: Decrypted value of smCommandData4 in AgentCommand (AgentKey)
    Best Answer

    Posted Feb 08, 2018 01:32 PM
    Hi Dhilip,


    How would it help you even if we disclose these internal specifics?


    I think for security reasons it is best not to provide such internal implimentation details here.


    Regards

    Ujwol

     




  • 3.  Re: Decrypted value of smCommandData4 in AgentCommand (AgentKey)

    Posted Feb 09, 2018 01:00 AM

    Hi Ujwol,

     

    I am just curious to know (in detail) about the product which I am using everyday.

    In case, if this cannot be shared for security reasons, no problem.

     

    But, I could see that you have used the term 'here'. So, is it possible to obtain these details if I raise a support ticket?

     

    Regards,

    Dhilip



  • 4.  Re: Decrypted value of smCommandData4 in AgentCommand (AgentKey)

    Posted Feb 09, 2018 01:01 AM

    Hi Dhilip,


    We cannot share the code level implementation details even via support case.


    Regards,

    Ujwol



  • 5.  Re: Decrypted value of smCommandData4 in AgentCommand (AgentKey)

    Posted Feb 09, 2018 01:04 AM

    Hi Ujwol,

     

    Ok. Thanks for your response.

     

    Regards,

    Dhilip