Automic Workload Automation

  • 1.  database performance

    Posted Sep 28, 2016 05:42 AM
    How CPU and DB score are calculated?
    20160927/020014.904 - 20151109/112043.010 - U0003533 UCUDB: Check of data source finished: No errors. Performance CPU/DB: '27106541'/'79'
    20160927/020014.904 - 20151109/112043.010 - U0003544 UCUDB: Reference values tested with Windows 2003 on XEON 1500 MHz: CPU 813865, DB 470

    The first value is produced by adding 1+1+1+1+1.... for 1 second.
    The second value is produced by writing one sentence in a specific table, do a rollback, try to read it. After that it goes again, write, rollback, read,... Here we do this also for one second.

    So all in all, if the value is higher, it is a good performance, the low it is, it is worse performance.



  • 2.  database performance

    Posted Sep 28, 2016 05:52 AM
    THX for this info!


  • 3.  Re: database performance

    Posted Jun 14, 2018 03:49 PM

    The second value is produced by writing one sentence in a specific table, do a rollback, try to read it. After that it goes again, write, rollback, read,... Here we do this also for one second.

    Can the statements for the DB performance check be made available so they can be run and measured outside of the application?



  • 4.  Re: database performance

    Posted Jun 15, 2018 03:50 AM

    I also would like to have this statement.

    I can remember that Michael_Lowry some time ago reaised the same request, but I don't remember if he ever did receive an answer....



  • 5.  Re: database performance

    Posted Jun 15, 2018 07:52 AM

    Yes, I asked for the SQL statements used to measure performance. I cannot find the discussion now. I might have been in a comment on a documentation page. (Those discussions were saved, but they are not visible in the new system.) I never received an answer to my request.



  • 6.  Re: database performance

    Posted Jun 15, 2018 09:51 AM

    Those discussions were saved, but they are not visible in the new system

     

     

    This thread also reminded me that I still miss the nuances added by the flags. I can distinctly remember having flagged the OP as "lol" purely for the technical implementation of "adding 1+1+1+1 for a second". Not having that flag changes the entire meaning for me



  • 7.  Re: database performance

    Broadcom Employee
    Posted Jun 19, 2018 02:23 AM

    Hi Michael,

     

    it's the database sequence ‘insert + select + rollback’ in DIVDB table the WP is able to do in 1 second.

     

    But this sequence is nothing a WP have to deal with on regular base, like creating an object, update workflow monitor, update activities and so on. So it will give a value but not 100% related to AE activities.

     

    Peter