Hi Kristin,
This link appears to address SaaS version only, as I'm looking at 15.5.1 on-premise and I do not see the full, restricted and view types - only viewer, creator, participant and Studio.
Regarding types and how they are counted, seems like there is a problem:
- Studio:
- When I grant Dashboard rights (Personal\Dashboard) the user gets the ability to create portlets - No Studio license is granted - Great. Working as expected.
- When user creates a portlet, they get instance rights to edit their own portlet's definition - A Studio right is now counted -
- Not working as expected.
- The instance right indicates that it is dependent on Administration - Studio right, which the user does not have.
- However, the user still is counted as having a Studio license assigned.
- Studio licenses are prohibitively expensive, defeating the purpose of Personal Dashboards.
- We've only a few people with this Personal Dashboarding capability - we can kill this feature if we must.
- Custom objects we've developed:
- Users granted create/edit access to the custom object/sub-object content we create, require a Creator license.
- For creating/editing risks/issues, team members only need a Participant license.
- Why do these same team members need a Creator license to edit content we created ourselves? This is a disincentive to use Clarity for such things. Rather, it encourages one to look for other solutions.
Currently, all of our license types, per purchasing agreement, are "Full" or "Creator." Therefore, we haven't been looking at this "License Information" portlet. On new license purchase, I have been asked to look at the lower cost licenses, but not seeing how we could use them, when things we expect to see as "Participant" instead are counted as "Creator."
Seems that this License Information portlet isn't counting correctly.
Dale