Symantec IGA

  • 1.  Best practice reference architecture for Identity Suite VAPP

    Posted Jul 19, 2018 02:05 PM

    What would be the best practice reference architecture for Identity Suite Virtual Appliance Production deployments.

     

    CA Identity suite is a bundle of a lot of components (really lot), while there are kind of top 3 Key elements IDP, IDG, IDM - there are really low level elements like Provisioning Manager, Connector Server, the stores/databases, and so on (i will not just name everything with the client tools and stuff but you get what I am saying). 

     

    Just want to know how is the industry managing this and what is the adoption rate of VAPP. 



  • 2.  Re: Best practice reference architecture for Identity Suite VAPP

    Broadcom Employee
    Posted Jul 20, 2018 10:33 AM

    Hi

     

    We are about to release a reference architecture guide in the next few days, I will update as soon as it us published

     

    thanks

     

    Itamar Budin
    Sr Product Manager - IMAG Lifecycle

     

    Check out where we’re going, attend a CA Product Roadmap session: www.ca.com/roadmaps



  • 3.  Re: Best practice reference architecture for Identity Suite VAPP

    Posted Aug 24, 2018 12:30 PM

    Just checking in 



  • 4.  Re: Best practice reference architecture for Identity Suite VAPP
    Best Answer

    Broadcom Employee
    Posted Aug 27, 2018 05:18 AM

    There is now a "Reference Architecture" section in the Identity Suite documentation. In particular the "Logical Architecture and Network Context"

     

    Regarding your question about separation of the components, one guide is the required spec for each component in a production environment. And also it's typical to divide by tier.

     

    So your front end tier would be Identity Portal, Identity Manager and Identity Governance. Each of these requires 8 GB of free RAM in a "production" deployment, as well as the RAM required to run the OS. The recommended spec is 16 GB of RAM and 4 virtual CPUs (see here for full details). This would imply a single component on each vApp as there's not enough RAM there for two components. Alternatively, you could deploy a vApp with, say, 30 GB RAM and more CPUs, and then deploy all three front end components.

     

    The Provisioning Server, Connector Server and User Store are all considered back-end components. They also have lower memory requirements (6GB, 2GB and 4GB respectively). So they could all go on a single server.  

     

    Obviously, database must be external for a production deployment, and can be any of the supported options. And you will need an external Windows server to host the Windows Connector Server and other administrative tools.

     

    It also depends on your expected load. For high expected transaction volumes, you may wish to separate all components and even increase the memory available by customizing the JVM start-up parameters as described in the "custom JVM arguments" section here.

     

    Assuming that you want HA, you would then need 2 of each server type (except the central log server).

     

    Pearse