Clarity

  • 1.  CA PPM Load Balancing Monitor Issues

    Posted Sep 18, 2018 03:51 PM

    Our company has changed their policy on load balancing procedures and I am now facing a problem.  We use Netscaler, and the monitor is expecting to see a http 200 response from the test call.   I think the issue is that they are using the httprequest ["HEAD /"] which is giving them a http 400.  This is causing my environment to show as down.

     

    My network folks say:
    "Netscaler will use http://<IP>[header] where <IP> is individual IP for server/site and [header] is any additional text we provide. They can also specify a port to test other than the service port (2840 in this case) and also they can specify http or https"

     

    I can access the server from my browser, but when I look at the call using Fiddler, I see it is using a "GET".  The app-access log shows their call is using the "HEAD" method.

     

    I've been told that I need to figure out how to get Linux to respond to the call correctly, or come up with a default landing page under the NIKU_HOME directory for them to call.

     

    I'm hoping someone has faced this issue before and has advice on how I can resolve my problems. Maybe I'm missing an easy setting in CSA that will help??? 

     

    Thanks in advance,

    Terry



  • 2.  Re: CA PPM Load Balancing Monitor Issues
    Best Answer

    Posted Sep 21, 2018 11:34 AM

    Had a similar situation. Our workaround wasn't ideal, but it was better than nothing.  Because we also had siteminder in place, our monitoring used the unprotected wsdl urls to determine if the system was up or not.  It didn't eliminate the possibility of the load balancer being unreachable while PPM was still online, but it still allowed up to monitor whether or not PPM was up. 



  • 3.  Re: CA PPM Load Balancing Monitor Issues

    Posted Sep 21, 2018 01:37 PM

    Thank you for the suggestion. It makes sense that would be an option.   I will let my tech guys know about this and give it a try.   I'll let you know.

     

    Terry



  • 4.  Re: CA PPM Load Balancing Monitor Issues

    Posted Sep 26, 2018 09:03 PM

    Thank you Jason, your suggestion worked great in my environment.  Thank You!