ca.portal.admin

IDMSQSAM

Discussion created by ca.portal.admin on Jul 27, 2005
Latest reply on Jul 27, 2005 by ca.portal.admin
I'm wondering if anyone has noticed any difference in area sweeps by
using the IDMSQSAM option (in the SYSIDMS file). I tried it years ago
with DCB=BUFNO=10, 20, etc. but don't remember any substantial
improvments in processing time (I remember many years before that
jigging the DMCL assigned buffers for local area sweeps and seeing
improvement in pre rels 12 days).

Is this option just smoke and mirrors or are there other parameters I
can apply to improve our area sweeps?

(we're currently on z/OS, rels. 1.something and rels 14.1 of IDMS, not
sure how DASD is set up)

Alex McLellan - Ford of Canada Continuous Improvement (IT)
Dialnet: 853-1237 Phone: (905)845-2511 x1237 Fax: (905)845-5332
Email: amclella@ford.com

"
IDMS Public Discussion Forum
IDMS-L@LISTSERV.IUASSN.COM
SMTP
IDMS-L@LISTSERV.IUASSN.COM
IDMS-L@LISTSERV.IUASSN.COM
SMTP








Normal

Normal
Re: Rhdcctab
"Lutz,

IDMS makes the security calls based on what's in the #CTABGEN, and if
there's nothing in the #CTABGEN it doesn't make the calls, so it doesn't
matter what's in the system catalog with regards to the resource
activities. An activity code of 0 is assumed for those entities that are
not coded in the #CTABGEN. Activity code 0 represents no security. So
the public access is assumed for those entities even if you have the
resource activities defined in the SYSTEM catalog?

Regards,
Paul Mak

Outcomes