ca.portal.admin

DISCONNECT a MEMBER Record in a OM SET

Discussion created by ca.portal.admin on Oct 5, 2005
I am sending this note on behalf of one of our developers:

________________________________

From: Turner, Dan [IDR]
Sent: Wednesday, October 05, 2005 10:31 AM
To: Rozeboom, Kay [DAS]
Subject: DISCONNECT a MEMBER Record in a OM SET



Kay,



Can you send the following note to the IDMS Listserv group. I for some
reason am not authorized. Thanks!



Hello All:



We have discovered that when DISCONNECTING a MEMBER record from an OM
SET, that to our surprise you can still OBTAIN the OWNER in the SET.
This is true even if you do a COMMIT right after the DISCONNECT. This is
not was not what we would expect. We were expecting once you DISCONNECT
a member record in an OM SET, that you could not OBTAIN what was the
OWNER.



For some reason this is a problem for our developers. I'm not sure why,
but it is. I conducted this testing Using the DMLO tool.



We had another shop test one of their OM sets, and to their surprise
they too could OBTAIN the OWNER right after the DISCONNECT.



If you finish the program session, and then start a new one, and get
current on what was the MEMBER record, then at that point you can no
longer OBTAIN the OWNER in the SET. This is what is expected.



Any input on this would be appreciated.



Thanks!





Dan Turner, Database Design

Iowa Department of Revenue

515.281.7061 or 515.242.5915



Dan.Turner@Iowa.Gov







"
IDMS Public Discussion Forum
IDMS-L@LISTSERV.IUASSN.COM
SMTP
IDMS-L@LISTSERV.IUASSN.COM
IDMS-L@LISTSERV.IUASSN.COM
SMTP








Normal

Normal
Re: Problem with the List?
"I saw Bruce's messages just fine on the list.
The encrypted E-mail looks like PGP...

(But then I'm running PGP under MS Outlook)

Just an observation.

Pete.

Outcomes