ca.portal.admin

Re:SP4

Discussion created by ca.portal.admin on Nov 2, 2006
Hi all,

How confident is IDMS 16 SP4 ? Have you already put it in production ?

Many thanks,
Rene.

2006-11-02, 11:35:16
The information contained in this e-mail message and any attachments may be
privileged and confidential. If the reader of this message is not the
intended recipient or an agent responsible for delivering it to the intended
recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination,
distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If
you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender
immediately by replying to this e-mail and delete the message and any
attachments from your computer.
Notice of Confidentiality:
**This E-mail and any of its attachments may contain Lincoln National
Corporation proprietary information, which is privileged, confidential, or
subject to copyright belonging to the Lincoln National Corporation family of
companies. This E-mail is intended solely for the use of the individual or
entity to which it is addressed.
If you are not the intended recipient of this E-mail, you are hereby
notified that any dissemination, distribution, copying, or action taken in
relation to the contents of and attachments to this E-mail is strictly
prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this E-mail in error,
please notify the sender immediately and permanently delete the original and
any copy of this E-mail and any printout. Thank You.**
"
IDMS Public Discussion Forum
IDMS-L@LISTSERV.IUASSN.COM
SMTP
IDMS-L@LISTSERV.IUASSN.COM
IDMS-L@LISTSERV.IUASSN.COM
SMTP








Normal

Normal
Ex-CA Executive sentenced . . .
"http://biz.yahoo.com/ap/061102/software_sentence.html?.v=13
"
IDMS Public Discussion Forum
IDMS-L@LISTSERV.IUASSN.COM
SMTP
IDMS-L@LISTSERV.IUASSN.COM
IDMS-L@LISTSERV.IUASSN.COM
SMTP








Normal

Normal
Re: former CA CEO gets jail time
"And I suppose Charles Wang had nothing to do with this?
He was there for most of year 2000 and was rewarded handsomely for C.A.'s
""tremendous performance"".
But I guess leaving C.A. got him out of the D.A.'s cross-hairs.
Who ever said ""Crime doesn't pay"".

----- Original Message -----
From: ""Chris Hoelscher"" <choelscher@HUMANA.COM>
To: <IDMS-L@LISTSERV.IUASSN.COM>
Sent: Thursday, November 02, 2006 2:11 PM
Subject: former CA CEO gets jail time

http://money.cnn.com/2006/11/02/news/newsmakers/kumar.reut/



CA's ex-CEO gets 12 years for fraud
Sanjay Kumar also fined $8 million for his role in $2.2 billion accounting
fraud at software company.
November 2 2006: 1:01 PM EST

NEW YORK (Reuters) -- Sanjay Kumar, the former chief executive of CA, was
sentenced to 12 years in federal prison Thursday for his role in a $2.2
billion accounting fraud at the computer software company.
U.S. Judge Leo Glasser also fined the former executive $8 million. Kumar's
surrender date was set for Feb. 27.
He was also given three years of supervised release for each of eight
counts to which he pleaded guilty.
Kumar, 44, pleaded guilty to charges including conspiracy, securities
fraud and obstruction of justice in federal court in Brooklyn in April.
As part of the accounting scheme, Kumar improperly booked software license
revenue from 1999 to 2000 in order to meet Wall Street analysts' profit
expectations and then lied to investigators about it, the government said.
Assistant U.S. Attorney Eric Komitee told the judge that Kumar's actions
represented ""the most brazen and comprehensive obstruction in the modern
era of corporate crime.""
His lawyers asked for leniency, citing Kumar's good works.
""This is not a case where the fraud affected the fundamental health of the
company,"" said defense attorney Robert Fiske. ""CA is still a thriving
company.""
CA, previously known as Computer Associates International, restated its
results for fiscal years 2001 through 2004 after Kumar left the company in
2004.
The company agreed to pay $225 million in shareholder restitution and
continues to cooperate with the government as part of a deferred
prosecution agreement.
CA competes in the corporate software industry with BMC Software (Charts)
EMC (Charts) and IBM (Charts).
Shares of CA (up $0.32 to $25.02, Charts) rose 1.9 percent in afternoon
trade Thursday.



Chris Hoelscher
IDMS & DB2 Database Administrator
Humana Inc
502-476-2538
choelscher@humana.com




The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to
which it is addressed and may contain CONFIDENTIAL material. If you
receive this material/information in error, please contact the sender and
delete or destroy the material/information.

"
IDMS Public Discussion Forum
IDMS-L@LISTSERV.IUASSN.COM
SMTP
IDMS-L@LISTSERV.IUASSN.COM
IDMS-L@LISTSERV.IUASSN.COM
SMTP








Normal

Normal
Unlinked Index
"We have the need to add an index to a Calc record. The index will be
Mandatory Automatic with Duplicates Last.

There are definitely advantages to adding this index as unlinked (no
restructure to data area, no relocated records, no orphans).

The access to the record will be done with an OBTAIN WITHIN set-name
USING, we do not anticipate any retrieval to the data area followed by
index traversal.

So, other than the obvious risk of poor performance if a program walks
up the index, are there any other issues with creating unlinked indexes?

Thanks,
Steve Nason
"
IDMS Public Discussion Forum
IDMS-L@LISTSERV.IUASSN.COM
SMTP
IDMS-L@LISTSERV.IUASSN.COM
IDMS-L@LISTSERV.IUASSN.COM
SMTP








Normal

Normal
Re: Unlinked Index
"Unlinked is not the best option if the index has a lot of delete
activity. Without an up pointer, performance will again be an issue for
the same reason.

BTW....congrats on the World Series win.

Linda Campbell
Informatix Inc

Outcomes