ca.portal.admin

Re:Multitasking - is it worth it?

Discussion created by ca.portal.admin on Oct 2, 2008
I have a system which is purely Batch and CICS. There is no IDMS DC or =
ADS.
=20
Would multitasking bring me any advantage or would it just be an =
overhead?
=20
R16 SP6 . Z/OS 1.9. 4 processor large IBM thing - I lose track of the =
model numbers.
=20
My system is well buffered and uses dataspaces extensively. CPU =
availability is my issue. There is no paging and I/O is not a problem.
=20
Thanks for any tips.=20
=20
______________________________________________________________
=20
Chris Trayler, IXD
Bank Julius Baer & Co. Ltd.
P. O. Box, CH-8010 Z=FCrich, Switzerland
Telephone +41 (0)58 887 4332, Fax +41 (0)58 887 4969 www.juliusbaer.com =
<http://www.juliusbaer.com/>=20
=20
______________________________________________________________
*****JuliusBaer Disclaimer***** This e-mail is for the intended =
recipient only and may contain confidential or privileged information. =
If you have received this e-mail by mistake, please contact us =
immediately and completely delete it (and any attachments) and do not =
forward it or inform any other person of its contents. If you send us =
messages by e-mail, we take this as your authorization to correspond =
with you by e-mail, however, we will not accept the electronic =
transmission of orders/instructions without a specific agreement being =
in place to govern the same. If you do not wish to receive any further =
e-mail correspondence please let us know. E-mail transmission cannot be =
guaranteed to be secure or error-free as information could be =
intercepted, amended, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or =
incomplete, or contain viruses. Neither the Julius Baer Group nor the =
sender accept liability for any errors or omissions in the content of =
this message which arise as a result of its e-mail transmission. Please =
note that all e-mail communications to and from the Julius Baer Group =
may be monitored. This communication is for informational purposes only. =
It is not intended as an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale =
of any financial instrument or as an official confirmation of any =
transaction.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------=

My e-mail address has been harmonized into @dexia.com !
Please remember to update your contact list.
Veuillez noter que mon adresse e-mail est harmonis=E9e en @dexia.com !
N'oubliez pas de mettre =E0 jour votre liste de contacts.
Meine E-Mailadresse wurde harmonisiert zu @dexia.com Vergessen Sie nicht =
Ihre Kontaktadresse anzupassen.
Mijn e-mailadres is geharmoniseerd naar @dexia.com.
Vergeet niet uw contactenlijst aan te passen.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------=

Dexia disclaimer:
http://www.dexia.com/maildisclaimer.htm
-------------------------------------------------------------------------=
"
IDMS 3rd-party providers forum
IDMSVENDOR-L@LISTSERV.IUASSN.COM
SMTP
IDMSVENDOR-L@LISTSERV.IUASSN.COM
IDMSVENDOR-L@LISTSERV.IUASSN.COM
SMTP








Normal

Normal
Re: Multitasking - is it worth it?
"For a period of time we were seriously CPU constrained. We turned on multi-tasking, it cost us about 12% in overhead, but it improved throughput markedly working on the same CPU constrained machine. When the CPU constraint was removed after a significantly more powerful machine was brought in - we removed multi-tasking and IDMS continues to perform like the champion that it is.

As you surmise, when IDMS is waiting on an EREECB that means that it's waiting for the batch program to complete processing and issue another DML request. So this state indicates that there's not enough cycles for the batch jobs to run fast enough to keep IDMS as busy as it might otherwise be.

I'm assuming you've looked at ways not to run under CV mode. For example - if different parts of the database could be taken offline so that a number of jobs (each processing different parts of the database) could run in local mode - then you will remove some CPU load from the box as a whole - by getting rid of the CV mode and locking overhead (run in exclusive update when in local) - and this should stop them from competing with each other for CPU cycles. We have also gotten relief in the past by serialising some jobs - turns out they ran better that way then letting them thrash it out while running concurrently. Maybe there's a few things you can look at?

Cheers - Gary


Gary Cherlet
Justice Technology Services
Department of Justice, SA Government
Telephone +61 (0)8 8226 5199
Facsimile +61 (0)8 8226 5311
Mobile +61 (0)41 333 1613
MailTo:cherlet.gary@saugov.sa.gov.au

This e-mail message and any attachments are qualified as follows: Addressing: If you have received this e-mail in error, please advise by reply e-mail to the sender. Please also destroy the original transmission and its contents. Confidentiality: This e-mail may contain confidential information which also may be legally privileged. Only the intended recipient(s) may access, use, distribute or copy this e-mail. Individual Views: Unless otherwise indicated, the views expressed are those of the sender, not Justice Technology Services. Computer Viruses: It is the recipient's responsibility to check the e-mail and any attached files for viruses.

Outcomes