ca.portal.admin

yet another loophole fixed in 17 (maybe 16)

Discussion created by ca.portal.admin on Mar 25, 2009
Latest reply on Nov 6, 2012 by paul.mak
we have a very few DMCL symbolics used (in test only - none I am aware
of
in prod)

anyhow - after installing 17 - dome DMCLs would not generate - seems
that
if you have a index displacement specified in the DMCL larger than the
number of pages defined to the area - the DMCL will not generate! -
while
this is a reasonable check, this was seemingly not checked in release 15
because i am sure these DMCLs have been generated in 15 with the same
(invalid) displacement specified ...

fyi .....


Chris Hoelscher
Senior IDMS & DB2 Database Administrator
Humana Inc
502-476-2538
choelscher@humana.com




The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to
which it is addressed and may contain CONFIDENTIAL material. If you
receive this material/information in error, please contact the sender
and delete or destroy the material/information.
"
IDMS 3rd-party providers forum
IDMSVENDOR-L@LISTSERV.IUASSN.COM
SMTP
IDMSVENDOR-L@LISTSERV.IUASSN.COM
IDMSVENDOR-L@LISTSERV.IUASSN.COM
SMTP








Normal

Normal
Re: yet another loophole fixed in 17 (maybe 16)
"I had that problem in R16 SP6, only then the compiler just said you had
a problem, not even what segment it was in. The error message was
changed with an fix TC05869
Message number DB004097. I believe the fix has gone ""production"" but
don't have that APAR number.

Dick

Richard Pierce
(617) 973-8911
richard.pierce@state.ma.us

Outcomes