ca.portal.admin

need justification for release 17 ?

Discussion created by ca.portal.admin on May 1, 2009
our performance folks have looked at 10 days worth of data and already
determined that (without additional tuning) the use of zIIP processors
in
IDMS will reduce our CPU costs by $250K / year!


Chris Hoelscher
Senior IDMS & DB2 Database Administrator
Humana Inc
502-476-2538
choelscher@humana.com

you only need to test the programs that you want to work correctly




The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to
which it is addressed and may contain CONFIDENTIAL material. If you
receive this material/information in error, please contact the sender
and delete or destroy the material/information.

-----------------------------------------
The information in this message may be proprietary and/or
confidential, and protected from disclosure. If the reader of this
message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent
responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient,
you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
received this communication in error, please notify First Data
immediately by replying to this message and deleting it from your
computer.
"
IDMS Public Discussion Forum
IDMS-L@LISTSERV.IUASSN.COM
SMTP
IDMS-L@LISTSERV.IUASSN.COM
IDMS-L@LISTSERV.IUASSN.COM
SMTP








Normal

Normal
Re: need justification for release 17 ?
"How many CVs is that savings spread over?=0D=0A=0D=0ATom Lindh - IDMS Datab=
ase Systems Programmer=0D=0AFirst Data USA - GTO Enterprise Servers - z/OS =
Database Systems=0D=0AOffice#: 303 - 967 - 6136=0D=0ACell#: 720 - 810 - 598=
5=0D=0AFax#: 303 - 967 - 8228=0D=0A=0D=0A-----Original Message-----=0D=0AFr=
From: IDMS Public Discussion Forum [mailTo:IDMS-L@LISTSERV=2EIUASSN=2ECOM]=0D=
=0AOn Behalf Of Chris Hoelscher=0D=0ASent: Friday, May 01, 2009 9:17 AM=0D=
=0ATo: IDMS-L@LISTSERV=2EIUASSN=2ECOM=0D=0ASubject: need justification for =
release 17 ?=0D=0A=0D=0Aour performance folks have looked at 10 days worth =
of data and already=0D=0Adetermined that (without additional tuning) the us=
e of zIIP processors=0D=0Ain=0D=0AIDMS will reduce our CPU costs by $250K /=
year!=0D=0A=0D=0A=0D=0AChris Hoelscher=0D=0ASenior IDMS & DB2 Database Adm=
inistrator=0D=0AHumana Inc=0D=0A502-476-2538=0D=0Achoelscher@humana=2Ecom=
=0D=0A=0D=0Ayou only need to test the programs that you want to work correc=
tly=0D=0A=0D=0A=0D=0A=0D=0A=0D=0AThe information transmitted is intended on=
ly for the person or entity to=0D=0Awhich it is addressed and may contain C=
ONFIDENTIAL material=2E If you=0D=0Areceive this material/information in e=
rror, please contact the sender=0D=0Aand delete or destroy the material/inf=
ormation=2E=0D=0A=0D=0A-----------------------------------------=0D=0AThe i=
nformation in this message may be proprietary and/or=0Aconfidential, and pr=
otected from disclosure=2E If the reader of this=0Amessage is not the inte=
nded recipient, or an employee or agent=0Aresponsible for delivering this m=
essage to the intended recipient,=0Ayou are hereby notified that any dissem=
ination, distribution or=0Acopying of this communication is strictly prohib=
ited=2E If you have=0Areceived this communication in error, please notify F=
irst Data=0Aimmediately by replying to this message and deleting it from yo=
ur=0Acomputer=2E
"
IDMS 3rd-party providers forum
IDMSVENDOR-L@LISTSERV.IUASSN.COM
SMTP
IDMSVENDOR-L@LISTSERV.IUASSN.COM
IDMSVENDOR-L@LISTSERV.IUASSN.COM
SMTP








Normal

Normal
FW: R17 upgrade - SVC problem
"We think we have resolved the problem with help from Brian Brendlinger of CA. (Won't know for sure until we IPL on Sunday morning.)

Prior to R15, CAIRIM automatically loaded a security module called CAS9SEC. Now you have to load it yourself with the CAIRIM syntax below, which we were not doing. Although we have been on R16 for several years, we did not get caught by this until now because CAIRIM was still loading the old R14 SVC, which in turn loaded CAS9SEC. When our MVS person added the syntax to load the R17 SVC, he removed the old R14 syntax. So CAS9SEC did not get loaded.

PRODUCT(CA-SECURITY/INIT) VERSION(S910) INIT(S910INIT)

Outcomes