ca.portal.admin

Re:Re: Get storage

Discussion created by ca.portal.admin on Jul 23, 2009
Kay,
=20
You could always write an assembler routine that does the GETSTG passing
it= the length and it returning the pointer. Sorry but I missed why the
use of=
LENGTH and POINTER are so important. =20
=20
Pete

________________________________

From: IDMS Public Discussion Forum on behalf of Rozeboom, Kay [DAS]
Sent: Thu 23/07/2009 15:48
To: IDMS-L@LISTSERV.IUASSN.COM
Subject: Re: Get storage



I was wrong about getting a clean compile. When I looked at the code
gener= ated by the pre-compiler (which I should have done earlier),
there was no r= eference to the length or pointer fields. And lo and
behold, there were so= me warning (not error) messages saying that these
parameters were not valid= . No wonder my pointer wasn't working - it
hadn't been set by the ""get sto= rage"" command, so contained garbage.

Apparently you really can't use these parameters with COBOL LE. Bummer.

Outcomes