ca.portal.admin

[IDMS-L] Question about CA - HYPER NOTIFICATION - RO20143 IDMS

Discussion created by ca.portal.admin on Jul 27, 2010
Latest reply on Jul 27, 2010 by ca.portal.admin
- OS getmain problem

This refers to IBM apar OA27291 on z/OS 1.10. If we are going to 1.11
does anyone know if we still need to apply it?

Hoping support will see this.

TIA


Jim


Jim Rice
jlrice@southernco.com
ph (404) 506-4148
Fax (404) 506- 4870
Customer Focused/Client Oriented since 1991

This e-mail and any of its attachments may contain proprietary Southern
Company and/or affiliate information that is privileged, confidential,
or protected by copyright belonging to Southern Company and/or its
affiliates. This e-mail is intended solely for the use of the
individual or entity for which it is intended. If you are not the
intended recipient of this e-mail, any dissemination, distribution,
copying, or action taken in relation to the contents of and attachments
to this e-mail is contrary to the rights of Southern Company and/or its
affiliates and is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient of
this e-mail, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and
permanently delete the original and any copy or printout of this e-mail
and any attachments. Thank you.
"
IDMS 3rd-party providers forum
IDMSVENDOR-L@LISTSERV.IUASSN.COM
SMTP
IDMSVENDOR-L@LISTSERV.IUASSN.COM
IDMSVENDOR-L@LISTSERV.IUASSN.COM
SMTP








Normal

Normal
Re: Question about CA - HYPER NOTIFICATION - RO20143 IDMS - OS getmain problem
"We are currently running 16.0 SP4 on z/OS 1.11 (skipped 1.10) with no
problems (and without RO20143).

I looked up OA27291, and the net result seemed to be that a change in
VSM was introduced in z/OS 1.10, it caused some people some problems,
and as of z/OS 1.11 the behavior of VSM is controlled by the DIAGxx
parameter ""VSM USEZOSV1R9RULES"". The default in z/OS 1.11 is ""VSM
USEZOSV1R9RULES(YES)"",
which essentially negates the change made to VSM in 1.10 - we are taking
the default.

Outcomes