christine.takeuchi wrote:
* In order to insert a record into the sub-object I'm thinking I need to figure out how to get the next auto-number in the sub-object's sequence...........
Its the word "insert" that worries us.... this sounds like you are complemplating a direct database insert here, and that is what we are saying is a "bad thing". :what:
christine.takeuchi wrote:
..........should I be going down a different path?
Slightly, yes! :-)
christine.takeuchi wrote:
....but Is it possible to have a step in a process XOG in a record?
Yes - you have a 'custom action' as the step in the process, and the custom action is a GEL script ; from which you can (within reason) do most things (for example XOG data into Clarity).
However you don't
need* to embed XOG in a GEL script / process - you can call XOG from
any client language that supports calls to web-services; for example an Oracle PL/SQL stored procedure (or the SQL*Server equivalent).
* - But since you want the action to be intiated by a user-initiated event "in" Clarity then a process is the right thing.
--
Just to be clear, the only thing that I am saying to be cautious about is the implied direct-database insert of the sub-object records ; I am really just saying that that sub-object record creation
should be done through a XOG call.