Re: Common Signon

Discussion created by ca.portal.admin on Mar 3, 2006
I will not speak fopr Dan, but i think the only reason he wanted to
keep the program on the ""back-end"" CV was due to duplicate program names
between CVs - but it is my contention what with properly constructed
LOADLISTS and the appropriate setting of aforementioned LOADLIST (and
TEST) - the correct program could be run from ANY CV and the DB work
directed to the appripriate CV - but there may be other reasons what Dan
wanted the programs to execute on the back-end CV.

Chris Hoelscher
IDMS & DB2 Database Administrator
Humana Inc

The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to
which it is addressed and may contain CONFIDENTIAL material. If you
receive this material/information in error, please contact the sender
and delete or destroy the material/information.

IDMS Public Discussion Forum


Re: Common Signon
"Should have stopped with your first six words Chris. :-)

There are many reasons at this time why we MUST run the applications in
their own unique CV's. So I am stuck with that part of the design for
the 'common signon'.

While this discussion continues, I would like to thank everyone who has
sent in ideas. I am gathering them all together and plan to present them
to my management in the next couple of weeks.

Dan Hall