ca.portal.admin

Re: Common Signon

Discussion created by ca.portal.admin on Mar 3, 2006
I will not speak fopr Dan, but i think the only reason he wanted to
keep the program on the ""back-end"" CV was due to duplicate program names
between CVs - but it is my contention what with properly constructed
LOADLISTS and the appropriate setting of aforementioned LOADLIST (and
DCUF
TEST) - the correct program could be run from ANY CV and the DB work
directed to the appripriate CV - but there may be other reasons what Dan
wanted the programs to execute on the back-end CV.



Chris Hoelscher
IDMS & DB2 Database Administrator
Humana Inc
502-710-3038
choelscher@humana.com




The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to
which it is addressed and may contain CONFIDENTIAL material. If you
receive this material/information in error, please contact the sender
and delete or destroy the material/information.

"
IDMS Public Discussion Forum
IDMS-L@LISTSERV.IUASSN.COM
SMTP
IDMS-L@LISTSERV.IUASSN.COM
IDMS-L@LISTSERV.IUASSN.COM
SMTP








Normal

Normal
Re: Common Signon
"Should have stopped with your first six words Chris. :-)

There are many reasons at this time why we MUST run the applications in
their own unique CV's. So I am stuck with that part of the design for
the 'common signon'.

While this discussion continues, I would like to thank everyone who has
sent in ideas. I am gathering them all together and plan to present them
to my management in the next couple of weeks.

Dan Hall

Outcomes