ca.portal.admin

IDMS vs IMS performance

Discussion created by ca.portal.admin on May 23, 2006
Hello,

We are considering migrating about 60 GIG of data currently held in
(IBM's) IMS databases into an IDMS database.

Does anyone have any ideas about the performance differences between
these two databases? Has anyone else done such a conversion? And is
there anything else that perhaps might be useful for me to be aware of?

Thanks very much.

"
IDMS Public Discussion Forum
IDMS-L@LISTSERV.IUASSN.COM
SMTP
IDMS-L@LISTSERV.IUASSN.COM
IDMS-L@LISTSERV.IUASSN.COM
SMTP








Normal

Normal
IDMS vs IMS performance
"Hello,

We are considering migrating about 60 GIG of data currently held in
(IBM's) IMS databases into an IDMS database.

Does anyone have any ideas about the performance differences between these
two databases? Has anyone else done such a conversion? And is there
anything else that perhaps might be useful for me to be aware of?

Thanks very much.

"
IDMS Public Discussion Forum
IDMS-L@LISTSERV.IUASSN.COM
SMTP
IDMS-L@LISTSERV.IUASSN.COM
IDMS-L@LISTSERV.IUASSN.COM
SMTP








Normal

Normal
Re: [IDMSVENDOR-L] CPU effectiveness
"Kay, - it has been mu understanding that a value of 1 indicates that you
NEVER wait on CPU - thus, as close to 1 as possible is desirable

what is acceptable? I have CVs frequently .9 and above ....but i also have
CVs quite often at .3 and below ... but until someone complains and I turn
on wait SMF record production, I will not know how much a given
transaction waits on CPU ...


Chris Hoelscher
IDMS & DB2 Database Administrator
Humana Inc
502-710-3038
choelscher@humana.com




The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain CONFIDENTIAL material. If you receive this material/information in error, please contact the sender and delete or destroy the material/information.

"
IDMS Public Discussion Forum
IDMS-L@LISTSERV.IUASSN.COM
SMTP
IDMS-L@LISTSERV.IUASSN.COM
IDMS-L@LISTSERV.IUASSN.COM
SMTP








Normal

Normal
CPU effectiveness
"R16 (we are at SP2) has a DCMT command that displays CPU effectiveness:
DCMT D SUBTASK EFF

I have a question: What is the highest CPU effectiveness that one can
expect to achieve on a system with plenty of CPU available?

Kay Rozeboom
State of Iowa
Information Technology Enterprise
Department of Administrative Services
Telephone: 515.281.6139 Fax: 515.281.6137
Email: Kay.Rozeboom@Iowa.Gov

"
IDMS Public Discussion Forum
IDMS-L@LISTSERV.IUASSN.COM
SMTP
IDMS-L@LISTSERV.IUASSN.COM
IDMS-L@LISTSERV.IUASSN.COM
SMTP








Normal

Normal
Re: DC174018 in Mapless Dialog
"Bill:

I tested it in our 14.1 and we received this message: IDMS DC174018 V90
CA-ADS ABEND. DISPLAY COMMAND FOUND IN MAPLESS DIALOG

The same thing on 16.0 sp1 .

Thanks.

J. Sotela

From: Bill Allen <ARCHCONB@AOL.COM>
Reply-To: IDMS Public Discussion Forum <IDMS-L@LISTSERV.IUASSN.COM>
To: IDMS-L@LISTSERV.IUASSN.COM
Subject: DC174018 in Mapless Dialog
Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 18:36:55 EDT

Hello All:

Starting with release 16.0 SP3 at one of my client sites we are receiving:

+IDMS DC174018 V9 CA-ADS ABEND. DISPLAY COMMAND FOUND IN MAPLESS  DIALOG

Here is the issue, yes, this dialog is map less, but, the PREMAP does have
the code that issues a display. This dialog compiles just fine under 16.0
SP3
with the display command in the process code. It fails at execution time.

The same dialog with the exact same process code executes fine and compiles
fine in our Production environment which is running IDMS 14.1.

This is a CAS Dialog, the name is COEDILT0, the PREMAP process code is
COEDILT0-PREMAP.

I don't know why it runs fine in 14.1 and aborts in 16.0?

I have searched Support Connect and could not find anything?

Anybody have any thought or ideas?

Bill Allen
ARCH Consulting Associates, Ltd.
_________________________________________________________________
FREE pop-up blocking with the new MSN Toolbar - get it now!
http://toolbar.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200415ave/direct/01/

"
IDMS Public Discussion Forum
IDMS-L@LISTSERV.IUASSN.COM
SMTP
IDMS-L@LISTSERV.IUASSN.COM
IDMS-L@LISTSERV.IUASSN.COM
SMTP








Normal

Normal
DC174018 in Mapless Dialog
"Hello All:

Starting with release 16.0 SP3 at one of my client sites we are receiving:

+IDMS DC174018 V9 CA-ADS ABEND. DISPLAY COMMAND FOUND IN MAPLESS  DIALOG

Here is the issue, yes, this dialog is map less, but, the PREMAP does have
the code that issues a display. This dialog compiles just fine under 16.0 SP3
with the display command in the process code. It fails at execution time.

The same dialog with the exact same process code executes fine and compiles
fine in our Production environment which is running IDMS 14.1.

This is a CAS Dialog, the name is COEDILT0, the PREMAP process code is
COEDILT0-PREMAP.

I don't know why it runs fine in 14.1 and aborts in 16.0?

I have searched Support Connect and could not find anything?

Anybody have any thought or ideas?

Bill Allen
ARCH Consulting Associates, Ltd.

"
IDMS Public Discussion Forum
IDMS-L@LISTSERV.IUASSN.COM
SMTP
IDMS-L@LISTSERV.IUASSN.COM
IDMS-L@LISTSERV.IUASSN.COM
SMTP








Normal

Normal
Re: DC174018 in Mapless Dialog
"Bill -

I want to say that there was an optional APAR that, when applied, would
cause all DISPLAY verbs under these circumstances to be converted to
WRITE LOGs, and display to the IDMS LOG, using some fixed DC message
code . . . but I can't seem to find it either . . .

I'll keep looking.

Mike

From: Bill Allen <ARCHCONB@AOL.COM>
Reply-To: IDMS Public Discussion Forum <IDMS-L@LISTSERV.IUASSN.COM>
To: IDMS-L@LISTSERV.IUASSN.COM
Subject: DC174018 in Mapless Dialog
Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 18:36:55 EDT

Hello All:

Starting with release 16.0 SP3 at one of my client sites we are
receiving:
>
+IDMS DC174018 V9 CA-ADS ABEND. DISPLAY COMMAND FOUND IN MAPLESS
+DIALOG

Here is the issue, yes, this dialog is map less, but, the PREMAP does
have the code that issues a display. This dialog compiles just fine
under 16.0
SP3
with the display command in the process code. It fails at execution
time.
>
The same dialog with the exact same process code executes fine and
compiles fine in our Production environment which is running IDMS 14.1.

This is a CAS Dialog, the name is COEDILT0, the PREMAP process code is
COEDILT0-PREMAP.

I don't know why it runs fine in 14.1 and aborts in 16.0?

I have searched Support Connect and could not find anything?

Anybody have any thought or ideas?

Bill Allen
ARCH Consulting Associates, Ltd.
_________________________________________________________________
FREE pop-up blocking with the new MSN Toolbar - get it now!
http://toolbar.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200415ave/direct/01/

------------------------------

End of IDMS-L Digest - 25 May 2006 to 26 May 2006 (#2006-48)
************************************************************

"
IDMS Public Discussion Forum
IDMS-L@LISTSERV.IUASSN.COM
SMTP
IDMS-L@LISTSERV.IUASSN.COM
IDMS-L@LISTSERV.IUASSN.COM
SMTP








Normal

Normal
Re: Corruption problem
"Hi,

Has anyone tested QO79307/8 to see that this problem is completely
fixed?

Thanks

Chris Wood
Alberta Department of Energy
CANADA

Outcomes