ca.portal.admin

Re:Performance Monitor question

Discussion created by ca.portal.admin on Jun 22, 2007
Does anyone know how much overhead is generated by collecting task-wait
statistics (""TSKWAIT=YES"" in #PMOPT)? The overhead I am interested in
is CPU.

Kay Rozeboom
State of Iowa
Information Technology Enterprise
Department of Administrative Services
Telephone: 515.281.6139 Fax: 515.281.6137
Email: Kay.Rozeboom@Iowa.Gov
"
IDMS Public Discussion Forum
IDMS-L@LISTSERV.IUASSN.COM
SMTP
IDMS-L@LISTSERV.IUASSN.COM
IDMS-L@LISTSERV.IUASSN.COM
SMTP








Normal

Normal
Performance Monitor question
"Does anyone know how much overhead is generated by collecting task-wait
statistics (""TSKWAIT=YES"" in #PMOPT)? The overhead I am interested in
is CPU.

Kay Rozeboom
State of Iowa
Information Technology Enterprise
Department of Administrative Services
Telephone: 515.281.6139 Fax: 515.281.6137
Email: Kay.Rozeboom@Iowa.Gov
"
IDMS Public Discussion Forum
IDMS-L@LISTSERV.IUASSN.COM
SMTP
IDMS-L@LISTSERV.IUASSN.COM
IDMS-L@LISTSERV.IUASSN.COM
SMTP








Normal

Normal
Re: [IDMSVENDOR-L] IDMS S683 issue with 160 SP4 and ZOS 1.7
"In a GOOGLE search I found from Nov/2008 states



WOW - I gotta get your version of GOOGLE - should make betting on the next
Super Bowl alot easier .....




The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain CONFIDENTIAL material. If you receive this material/information in error, please contact the sender and delete or destroy the material/information.
"
IDMS Public Discussion Forum
IDMS-L@LISTSERV.IUASSN.COM
SMTP
IDMS-L@LISTSERV.IUASSN.COM
IDMS-L@LISTSERV.IUASSN.COM
SMTP








Normal

Normal
IDMS S683 issue with 160 SP4 and ZOS 1.7
"Hello any ""Monks"" out there?


Went to IDMS 160.SP4 ZOS 1.7

A program, which issues a RACROUTE VERIFY, with worked under IDMS15.0 ZOS
1.4 now receives

08.43.02 STC09954 +PMDC VTAM SIGNON BY USER ID ==>AECTRKT
08.43.02 STC09954 +RACROUTE VERIFY IS NEXT
08.43.02 STC09954 +IDMS DC027012 V99 OPERATING SYSTEM ABEND S683 HAS
OCCURRED


In a GOOGLE search I found from Nov/2008 states



if you are trying to run authorized, 14.1 (as delivered) won't do so!
you need to check the idms-l archives using WAITPOST as a keyword - i have

posted the zap provided by CA that would allow a 14.1 region to honor the
""APF authorization"" of the steplib datasets.
chris hoelscher



But above does not find in IUA archives search. Anyone have the solution
text for ""WAITPOST""?

I am aware of all the RACF requirements to issue a RACROUTE VERIFY, but
why this worked before and now fails is a mystery .





Rob Klan/Cincinnati/IBM
Phone: 1-877-205-4871 (T/L: 349-2446)
ITN: 23492446
Email: rklan@us.ibm.com
"
IDMS Public Discussion Forum
IDMS-L@LISTSERV.IUASSN.COM
SMTP
IDMS-L@LISTSERV.IUASSN.COM
IDMS-L@LISTSERV.IUASSN.COM
SMTP








Normal

Normal
Re: [IDMSVENDOR-L] IDMS S683 issue with 160 SP4 and ZOS 1.7
"GOOGLE GROUP search. my mistake for not adding....




Rob Klan/Cincinnati/IBM
Phone: 1-877-205-4871 (T/L: 349-2446)
ITN: 23492446
Email: rklan@us.ibm.com



Chris Hoelscher <choelscher@HUMANA.COM>
Sent by: IDMS Public Discussion Forum <IDMS-L@LISTSERV.IUASSN.COM>
06/25/2007 09:15 AM
Please respond to
IDMS Public Discussion Forum <IDMS-L@LISTSERV.IUASSN.COM>


To
IDMS-L@LISTSERV.IUASSN.COM
cc

Subject
Re: [IDMSVENDOR-L] IDMS S683 issue with 160 SP4 and ZOS 1.7






In a GOOGLE search I found from Nov/2008 states



WOW - I gotta get your version of GOOGLE - should make betting on the next
Super Bowl alot easier .....




The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to
which it is addressed and may contain CONFIDENTIAL material. If you
receive this material/information in error, please contact the sender and
delete or destroy the material/information.
"
IDMS Public Discussion Forum
IDMS-L@LISTSERV.IUASSN.COM
SMTP
IDMS-L@LISTSERV.IUASSN.COM
IDMS-L@LISTSERV.IUASSN.COM
SMTP








Normal

Normal
Re: Performance Monitor question
"I don't think we can turn off PMAM because we use the stats so much.
But I am considering turning off PMIM. Do you know how much that might
save us?

Outcomes