ca.portal.admin

Re:Re: 2 PDE copies in memory

Discussion created by ca.portal.admin on Aug 31, 2007
Last entry. Varying memory in a PDE program name (which is part of the
index) can cause lots of problems. Program not found, duplicate entries,

Cobol programs that are no longer defined as cobol etc.
So please do not vary a program name.
As Bill Allen said, it will definitely cause index corruption.
That being said, if you REALLY had to vary the name - make sure it fits
alphabetically into the index..
Ed McKinney
"
IDMS Public Discussion Forum
IDMS-L@LISTSERV.IUASSN.COM
SMTP
IDMS-L@LISTSERV.IUASSN.COM
IDMS-L@LISTSERV.IUASSN.COM
SMTP








Normal

Normal
Re: [IDMSVENDOR-L] 2 PDE copies in memory
"Yes, exactly. My procedure comes from this time (10.2).



Luis H.
IBM Global Services - VISTEON
=========================================



Chris Hoelscher <choelscher@HUMANA.COM>
Sent by: IDMS Public Discussion Forum <IDMS-L@LISTSERV.IUASSN.COM>
31/08/2007 12:23
Please respond to
IDMS Public Discussion Forum <IDMS-L@LISTSERV.IUASSN.COM>


To
IDMS-L@LISTSERV.IUASSN.COM
cc

Subject
Re: [IDMSVENDOR-L] 2 PDE copies in memory






kay - i have only seen this done when a pde gets corrupted or out of sync
with the SYSGEN (in 10.2 days) - and you wanted a fresh PDE for a program
-
rather then bouncing the CV, rename the PDE in memory - the next time the
program in invoked the system can't find a PDE for the program in memory,
so it loads a new PDE from the (presumable correct) sysgen entry for the
program


Chris Hoelscher
Senior IDMS & DB2 Database Administrator
Humana Inc
502-476-2538
choelscher@humana.com



The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to
which it is addressed and may contain CONFIDENTIAL material. If you
receive this material/information in error, please contact the sender and
delete or destroy the material/information.
"
IDMS Public Discussion Forum
IDMS-L@LISTSERV.IUASSN.COM
SMTP
IDMS-L@LISTSERV.IUASSN.COM
IDMS-L@LISTSERV.IUASSN.COM
SMTP








Normal

Normal
Re: 2 PDE copies in memory
"HI,


Question: This may a dumb question, but why would you ever want
to vary the
program name in a PDE?


Because I saw 3 program copies in memory (1 from dictname '' and
the other 2 from dictname DICTDB) and I tried to prevent that one loaded
from dictname '' be used).

I understood now that we can't do this anymore.

But at this point I already had 2 copies of the same program and
same dictname (DICTDB) loaded.




Luis H.
IBM Global Services - VISTEON
=========================================



""Rozeboom, Kay [DAS]"" <KAY.ROZEBOOM@IOWA.GOV>
Sent by: IDMS Public Discussion Forum <IDMS-L@LISTSERV.IUASSN.COM>
31/08/2007 12:05
Please respond to
IDMS Public Discussion Forum <IDMS-L@LISTSERV.IUASSN.COM>


To
IDMS-L@LISTSERV.IUASSN.COM
cc

Subject
Re: 2 PDE copies in memory






This may a dumb question, but why would you ever want to vary the
program name in a PDE?

Outcomes