ca.portal.admin

Re: IDMS communicating with more than 1 LPAR

Discussion created by ca.portal.admin on Sep 11, 2007
So one other question you may want to ask the list is what kind of cpu
overhead is entailed? Has anybody measured this?

If this is being done as part of a cpu reduction exercise, the group
proposing this needs to consider what extra cycles IDMS is going to need
to
burn to do x-LPAR communications. I have no idea if that's going to be
significant or not, but it should be factored in.

The easy part: IDMS should be put in the LPAR it gets the most traffic
from
to minimize any overhead.

Don Casey

Outcomes