ca.portal.admin

Re:Get storage

Discussion created by ca.portal.admin on Jul 22, 2009
Thanks to Tommy's and Peter's suggestion, I am now getting a clean =
compile. But I don't seem to be getting a valid pointer back at run =
time. Can anyone provide a way to convert the pointer to a displayable =
format? Or better yet, some sample code that uses the pointer parameter =
for ""get scratch""?

I wish the storage interface had separate ""get"" and ""put"" commands, like =
the scratch and queue interfaces do. I am having some difficulty =
determining which parameters apply to which situation.
"
IDMS 3rd-party providers forum
IDMSVENDOR-L@LISTSERV.IUASSN.COM
SMTP
IDMSVENDOR-L@LISTSERV.IUASSN.COM
IDMSVENDOR-L@LISTSERV.IUASSN.COM
SMTP








Normal

Normal
Re: Get storage
"Kay,

You could always write an assembler routine that does the GETSTG passing it the length and it returning the pointer. Sorry but I missed why the use of LENGTH and POINTER are so important.

Pete

________________________________

From: IDMS Public Discussion Forum on behalf of Rozeboom, Kay [DAS]
Sent: Thu 23/07/2009 15:48
To: IDMS-L@LISTSERV.IUASSN.COM
Subject: Re: Get storage



I was wrong about getting a clean compile. When I looked at the code generated by the pre-compiler (which I should have done earlier), there was no reference to the length or pointer fields. And lo and behold, there were some warning (not error) messages saying that these parameters were not valid. No wonder my pointer wasn't working - it hadn't been set by the ""get storage"" command, so contained garbage.

Apparently you really can't use these parameters with COBOL LE. Bummer.

Outcomes