ca.portal.admin

Re:Get storage

Discussion created by ca.portal.admin on Jul 22, 2009
Thanks to Tommy's and Peter's suggestion, I am now getting a clean compile.=
But I don't seem to be getting a valid pointer back at run time. Can any=
one provide a way to convert the pointer to a displayable format? Or bette=
r yet, some sample code that uses the pointer parameter for ""get scratch""?

I wish the storage interface had separate ""get"" and ""put"" commands, like th=
e scratch and queue interfaces do. I am having some difficulty determining=
which parameters apply to which situation.
"
IDMS 3rd-party providers forum
IDMSVENDOR-L@LISTSERV.IUASSN.COM
SMTP
IDMSVENDOR-L@LISTSERV.IUASSN.COM
IDMSVENDOR-L@LISTSERV.IUASSN.COM
SMTP








Normal

Normal
Re: Get storage
"It may come to that. I'm not sure my assembler skills are up to it though. :-)

We have a situation here where user programs need to pass XML to and from some common routines. The size of the XML can vary from a few hundred bytes to infininitely large. We are currently using a work record for this purpose, which is the defined as the 32K (the maximum work record size). This is unsatisfactory for a couple of reasons:
- All of the user programs have to allocate the 32K in their working storage which wastes a lot of space in many cases.
- 32K is not enough in other cases. Some XML documents are so large that it's not practical to try to fit them into pre-defined program storage.

The XML parse and generate commands need to work on the entire XML document at once. So we can't break it up into pieces, which rules out scratch and queue records. Plus we need to keep it fairly simple, so as not put an undue burden on the programmers.

With a pointer and a length, you can define the storage field as one byte in the linkage section, and manipulate the data using offsets. This works great with the XML parse command. I have done something similar in CICS, but I had access to the pointer and length values there. I don't here.

I think an assembler program may be the only option. Other suggestions will be more than welcome!

Outcomes