ca.portal.admin

Re:Re: Developer Question

Discussion created by ca.portal.admin on Jan 6, 2010
Onni,

Not true.

In the batch environment, if the next physical page has not
been allocated to your address space and you attempt to move
bytes from it, you will get an addressability error, which is
an S0C4. That is why it is recommended that your sort key
variable is at least 256 bytes, even if the key itself is only
1. By defining 256, you avoid the S0C4 when the key falls at
the end of the physical page since the additional storage will
force the next page to be allocated to your address space.

You are correct with respect to CV mode, however, fetch
protection only becomes an issue if you are running CV in, I
believe it is called, secure mode. In this mode, CV will set
all pages in the storage pool to have fetch protection turned
on. Then, as a task is dispatched, the task's pages have the
fetch protection attribute turned off as the storage key is
changed to user mode. In normal storage protect mode, CV only
changes the key of the page, not the fetch attribute.

In any case, the warning in the COBOL manual is for exactly
what I stated previously, and as the warning implies, is more
probable when the sort key field is defined in a file's record
buffer than when it occurs in a program's working storage area.
It can also be an issue when the sort key field is in the
linkage section as well. In that case, a wise precaution is to
move the sort key from the linkage section variable into a 256
byte working-storage section prior to using it in a DML verb.

Chuck

Outcomes